politics – Page 10

Thanks George

Via Michelle: this is why, for those of you who are still unclear, conservatives can’t get on board with saying Bush was a good president – as explained by our current Lunatic-in-Chief:

“It was hard for me to believe that you were entirely serious about that socialist question,” he told reporters, who had interviewed the president aboard Air Force One on Friday.

“I did think it might be useful to point out that it wasn’t under me that we started buying a bunch of shares of banks. It wasn’t on my watch. And it wasn’t on my watch that we passed a massive new entitlement -– the prescription drug plan — without a source of funding. And so I think it’s important just to note when you start hearing folks throw these words around that we’ve actually been operating in a way that has been entirely consistent with free-market principles and that some of the same folks who are throwing the word ’socialist’ around can’t say the same.”

So, thanks for giving him an excuse. It’s nice to know that the country’s most expensive screwup ever, which was orchestrated and passed by Democrats, will have a little R-shaped apostrophe next to it. That said, Obama sure loves pointing fingers at everyone else, doesn’t he?

Return of Van Voorhees

Iowahawk is back with another brilliant piece from T. Coddington Van Voorhees VII, this time addressing the latest drama within the Conservative movement. (I hear it in my head as being read by Colin Firth, in his role as Jack Worthing.) The money quote, in my opinion, is this:

Let us conservatives take comfort in that assurance, and in the fact that no matter what new taxes he has in mind, Mr. Obama has certain assembled a cabinet with no personal enthusiasm for paying them.

Brilliant, as always.

AIG – Keeping it Surreal

So in a fun little twist, AIG, after recieving its fourth bailout and posting a record loss quarter (and by a factor of about TEN) has decided to sue the US Government for having to pay taxes.

No, seriously.

Now, what makes this truly priceless is the comment section at Ace about this. Because without the humor provided by my fellow AoS Morons, I’d feel like reason:

I’d type something snarky and sarcastic, but right now I can’t see too well, on account of the BLOOD SHOOTING OUT OF MY EYES.

or Dang:

I can understand this. Every time my mother (83 years old) gives me a birthday present, I beat the s–t out of her. You know, to keep her in line. She keeps giving me presents. That’s where the whole “making sense” thing breaks down for me.

and then of course DrewM brings the absurdity to a whole new level:

AIG is suing us!

Technically, it’s suing itself. The US government owns and 80% or so stake in that money pit.

What a f–king world.

They’re coming to take me away, ha-ha, ho-ho, he-he, to the funny farm, where life is beautiful all the time…

Your tax dollars at work

This CNN headline was just too good to be true:

60 people get jobs from stimulus! SIXTY! That was certainly an efficient use of almost a trillion dollars. Why, 60 jobs in 42 days? That’s 1.4 jobs per day! Sure it’s nowhere near the one two three four million jobs that he promised, but really, over four years, thats over 2,000 jobs. And if he manages to refrain from passing another stimulus bill, we’ll keep it at under $400 million per job! Man, these must be some kind of jobs, right? I mean, this is the stimulus we’re talking about. I wonder what sort of revolutionary new project these lucky sixty men are working on?

Oh. Highway repair. And it turns out not all 60 were new jobs, but that the new project asking for 60 might allow him to “bring back some laid-off employees.” Oh, and it turns out that the company is being given $2.1 million to complete the six-month project, which comes out to… not really that much after all?

Now I’m not detracting construction jobs, and interstate highway maintenance is one of the few areas where the FedGov actually should be spending money (although this is a state route). But CNN’s grasping at straws here to make something out of nothing, in some sort of vain effort to justify a bloated “stimulus” package, which is not something a respectable news agency should be doing. Not that CNN’s resembled that in years, but still – it’s incredible how hard the media seems to be trying to keep people from realizing how badly we’ve just been screwed by Obama and his band of theives.

But don’t worry. Obama will provide for you.

Obama and LaHood on Tuesday announced the release of $27 billion in funds from the stimulus package “to help states create a 21st-century infrastructure.”

The president said it is part of the “largest new investment in America’s infrastructure since President Eisenhower built the Interstate Highway System.”

Since Eisenhower, man. And we all know how cool he was.

Can anyone take Obama – or CNN – seriously anymore? I certainly can’t.

Steele – not ready, not willing, not able

Via Michelle Malkin comes this Mark Steyn article on why the Michael Steele debacle is so bad:

Kathryn, in all the Rush-bashing, I was more disturbed by Michael Steele’s wretched performance. His initial reaction — that Rush’s show is “incendiary” and “ugly” — revealed:

a) that he never listens to it;

b) that he takes his cues from the mainstream media

….

In two brief soundbites, Mr. Steele has managed to suggest to his own party base that he has a lazy disposition that reflexively shares the liberal biases, and to allow the wider world to portray him as a craven squish. This is not encouraging. At the very minimum, he does not appear ready for primetime.

This shows that not only is he apparently a moron, but he is also out-of-touch and spineless. How could someone who is supposedly in charge of the party claiming conservatism never have bothered to listen to a three hour radio show that influences is listened to by over twenty million of his party’s constituents? And even if he hadn’t, he didn’t have the guts to admit his error, or even stand up for the principles of the man he was deriding.

Instead, he used all the buzzwords that the “drive by media” likes to use against Limbaugh, and then quickly apologized for being unintentionally offensive in using them after the aforementioned constituency started to get irritated about it. So he first proves himself clueless, and then backs it up with spinelessness.

Not ready for primetime? Mark, you’re understating it. The man is a liability.