Cox decides it wants to be hated like Comcast, too!

Techdirt and Ars Technica both reported this morning about a new plan unleashed on us poor Cox customers by the corporate talking heads: bandwidth throttling! And not even the innocuous “only when you’re using a lot” style of throttling, like Comcast uses (and got burned for), but the Jack-the-Ripper-style “whenever we feel like and only on certain kinds of traffic we don’t like” kind. The traffic they’ve moved to the “lower-priority” queue (read: throttled) so far includes:

  • File Access – Specifically FTP – this one makes no sense at all.
  • Network Storage – Bulk transfers of any kind – even less sense, if that’s possible.
  • P2P – Bittorrent, Limewire, and friends – because efficient distribution takes second seat to political correctness.
  • Software Updates – Windows Update and friends – you didn’t need that security patch any time soon, did you?
  • Usenet – Cox has hated on newsgroups for years. Big suprise here.

Cox was first to implement the three-strikes policy in regards to file sharing accusations, as well as lying about their reasons for doing so, and recieved what I found to be surprisingly minor backlash for it. Perhaps that lackluster response is what is prompting Cox to think they can get away with this relatively unscathed. Thankfully, in the meantime, Google has officially released its Measurement Lab, which aims to offer end users a good way to test their broadband connections and see what they’re really getting. This will offer customers a valuable tool, and give people like me who work in tech support a massive headache when everyone finds out their ISPs are shafting them.

Cox claims to be “your friend in the digital age.” With friends like these, who needs enemies?

Fight FOCA

Those of you who have been around for a while know my stance on the issue of abortion. It falls in the same column as the issue of murder – “don’t do it.” This isn’t a religious issue, despite how much the media (or the President) might want to play it off as such. This is a simple issue of whether or not the government should legalize genocide. The battle just became more difficult with Obama taking office and the Democrats securely holding both houses, so I was grateful when Prester Scott put out the call today to support, and made me aware of, Fight FOCA – an organized coalition dedicated to fighting the monstrocity that is the “Freedom Of Choice Act.” I’m going to shamelessly steal his assessment of the act:

FOCA, in the form in which it was filed in 2007, is a brief and sweeping bill that would eliminate, in one stroke, all federal, state and local laws and regulations that restrict or “discriminate against” abortion in any way. Among other things, this would:

  • End the ban on partial-birth abortion (which is really infanticide on a fully-developed child who just hasn’t left the womb yet).
  • Force taxpayers to fund abortion.
  • Spit in the face of (what’s left of) the Tenth Amendment’s protection of State powers. If a bulldozer measure like this were passed to preserve clearly enumerated Constitutional protections, that would be one thing, but abortion is not one of them. Roe v. Wade was patent judicial activism.
  • Eliminate parental-consent laws for minors seeking abortions. (If the States don’t matter, the rights of mere parents and families count even less.)
  • Potentially, strike down public health regulations and medical licensing on the practice of abortion. So much for keeping abortion “safe.”
  • Potentially, force medical personnel and/or hospitals that accept government-funded insurance (such as Medicaid) to perform abortions on demand. This is probably the most severe consequence. Doctors and nurses who don’t believe in abortion for religious or philosophical reasons could lose their licenses, or just find themselves practically unable to find employment. Catholic and other religious hospitals might have to close, all the charity work they do now to go undone. (What will this do to the economy, I wonder?)

President Obama told Planned Parenthood, “The first thing I’d do as President is sign the Freedom of Choice Act. That’s the first thing I’d do.” His record shows him to be arguably the most pro-abortion senator in the country, and he was infamously against Illinois’ Born Alive Infant Protection Act, a position which put him beyond pro-abortion and into pro-infanticide territory. His reasoning for opposing that act tottered somewhere between weak and absurd, to the point of directly stating that the inconvenience to doctors simply wasn’t outweighed by the fact human life was at risk. Now he has the opportunity to take his insanity to the national stage, having already slashed the regulations put in place by Bush (and Reagan, before Clinton had his way) to prevent our foreign aid money from being used to perform abortions.

Nancy Pelosi has also introduced a new expenditure in the montrous bailout plan being worked by Congress – an extra couple hundred million for “family planning” and contraceptives. She defends this by suggesting that children put an unnecessary burden on the goverment, and so by reducing births, they will reduce government costs, and stimulate the economy.

We are fighting an uphill battle here, and need to be on our toes at the very least until we can get some power back in 2010. Signing that petition would be a good start.

We’re screwed

You know, I didn’t think the recession would be that bad in the big scheme of thing. Rising costs of production suck, sure, but they can be dealt with. Jobs becoming a little scarcer is harsh too, but we can address it… but then I stumbled across this and realized our nation is doomed.

To offset the cost increases of cookie ingredients, Girl Scouts of the USA made the decision to shrink its cookie boxes by a centimeter, package fewer cookies into boxes of Thin Mints, Do-si-dos, and Tagalongs, and reduce the size of its Lemon Chalet Crèmes.

Okay Bernake, now it’s personal.

Happy Anniversary

Yesterday was the one-year anniversary of this blog. Today I posted my 100th post here.  In that year, I’ve gotten 15,803 hits (11,000 in one day from Insty, but still) and 148 comments.

Not bad at all for some guy posting his scatterbrained thoughts to the world, eh?

So here’s a chance for those of you still reading this to feedback to me: are there any things you’d like to see change around here? Anything you’d like to see me post more about (or less)?

Speed camera followup

Techdirt reports that Pinal County here in AZ has ditched its speed cameras, for a reason that’s rather obvious to me but quite shocking for Ms. Napolitano and her fan club: it makes the roads more dangerous – not less.

[Pinal County Sheriff Paul] Babeu said most of the total $134,199.43 in fines and fees from the paid citations covered administrative and operational costs, leaving the county with a net profit of $12,391.58 that Babeu dismissed as paltry.

Moreover, Babeu said, total motor-vehicle accidents increased by 16 percent in the same time period, and fatal collisions in the Queen Creek area doubled from three to six.

[…]

“I’m against photo speed enforcement completely,” Babeu said, walking the three-member panel through a detailed PowerPoint presentation. “Here in Pinal, it’s failed miserably.”

Miserably, indeed. Good for them for facing reality – and then actually acting accordingly. Let’s hope the rest of the state (or at least my own county!) follows in their footsteps.