Culture Wars, Episode IV: A New Hope

Over at Boar’s Head Tavern there’s been a discussion going on about cultural “wars” between Christians and, well, everyone else. How far should Christians go in confronting the culture at large? Should churches be involved formally in politics, social agendas, or lobbying? Should a pastor use his pulpit to preach only Jesus – or should he also preach what Jesus might do in today’s political climate? The question may seem simple, but the ramifications are not – and looking at history’s various churches and their failed attempts at striking the right balance only makes us wonder that much more. Where is the dividing line between too much and not enough? Where should the people be involved, where the organization should not?

The first question then is “what purpose does the church, as an institution, serve?” If we understand what churches actually supposed to do, we can understand better how to go about doing it. In the times of Acts, there was no clear distinction between the Church as a body of believers and the church as a formal organization. We do see that the Christians met together regularly, and from what I can tell in Scripture, the gatherings served four major purposes. I draw these primarily from the specific examples of the early church in Acts, and I think a good summation can be found in the post-Pentacost gathering described in Acts 2:42 – “And they devoted themselves to the apostles’ teaching and the fellowship, to the breaking of bread and the prayers.” Continue reading Culture Wars, Episode IV: A New Hope

No Condemnation

I’m working on a lengthier post that I may have up later today or tomorrow, but right now I feel like there’s something else I should be writing. Lately I’ve been struggling with a lot of things as I’m trying to put my life back together the way it needs to be, and one of the ways that I’ve come under attack is with spurts of crushing guilt and feelings of worthlessness. I get that little voice in my head that’s telling me that God isn’t going to waste his time on me, that I’m a failure, a hypocrite, a betrayer of Christ, so how could he really love me?

And then, this morning, Jon Acuff’s latest post popped up in my Google Reader.

“Therefore, there is now no condemnation for those who are in Christ Jesus, …”

If I’m being honest, sometimes I rewrite that verse in my head. I write it, “There is now some condemnation for those who are in Christ Jesus.” Or “There is now at least a little condemnation for those who are in Christ Jesus.” But that’s not what it says.

There is no condemnation.

There is no condemnation.

There is no condemnation.

Will the Holy Spirit convict you? Certainly. Will God reveal areas of your heart He wants to shine His light into? Without a doubt. Will God condemn you? Will God press play on the failure film of your life? Will He make you mentally relive your worst moments over and over again? No. That’s not God, that’s an attack.

Go read the whole thing.

There is therefore now no condemnation for those who are in Christ Jesus. How blessed we are to serve a God who so fully and completely loves us,  that he was willing to die just to give us the chance to be with him again. How can we ignore that? How can we respond to that in any other way than complete and total devotion?

If you’re under attack today, I hope that these words will help you to see that you’re not in this alone. God is always there, always forgiving, always the gracious and loving father – and where my words fail, his never will.

How great is our God!

Realistic Libertarianism

Several of my fellow conservatives have pointed out to me that I’m being inconsistent by espousing libertarian values while also saying I tentatively am fine with keeping in place the idea of controlled substances in place, especially so with a relatively harmless one such as marijuana. I realize that I did not fully flesh out my explanation as to why I think that way, and figured that said explanation could make a good followup post, so here we are.

First let me say that while I do hold to libertarian political values and ideals, I would consider myself to be realistic and responsible as a higher priority than those ideals – which means that sometimes a (hopefully temporary) compromise must be made between my ideals and my principles. While this may sound haughty or offensive to other libertarian thinkers, I don’t mean it to be – my point is simply that I don’t think we’re at a place where a full on overnight libertarian revolution would be a good thing – rather, it would be best to gradually move culture back to a place of responsibility and morality, and transition the political situation back to where it should be in the process. Let me explain why.

John Adams said, “Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.” He was right. In order to live in a society where personal freedom is left mostly unimpeded, that society must be responsible and moral, with a firm foundation. Unfortunately, our society today is neither responsible nor moral. A century of living with a government trending toward socialism and a dominant public education system created by Marxists and used to turn its students into drones has shredded the fabric of our society, and left us with a situation in which your average person thinks the government is a mother to protect and provide for them, and shuns the very idea of a disciplining father.

In order to be consistent with libertarian ideals, not only would marijuana be legalized, but the whole idea of controlled substances would go out the window. The DEA and FDA would cease to exist. All prescription drugs would be available over the counter at any drug store, and you could buy opiates at the Circle K on the corner along with your milk and bread. Can you imagine this being the case right now, in our current society? It would be suicidal to push for that kind of change without also pushing for a society where responsibility is a basic, essential value for every person. And I am not saying this society would be perfect; there will always be abusers and thieves and those who would exploit any system. Such is the nature of man. But I would submit that in a society where personal accountability was highly valued and the government was not looked to for any need but those few listed in out Constitution, such as that this country enjoyed when it was written, we would find that such ideals could play out with far less ill effect than if we were to find ourselves in that ideal today.

We cannot sit here and pretend that we have not failed our country miserably for the last century by allowing it to go this far. We cannot ignore the situation we live in and think everything will somehow work out for the best on its own. We need to undo all the evils that have been done in the last hundred years, for with that will come a natural shift toward personal responsibility, accountability, morality, and ultimately, liberty. Let’s not get ahead of ourselves.

Reader Question: Legalized Marijuana?

The first issue I was asked to address was that of legalized marijuana. Thank you so much, Elisabeth, for giving me such a non-controversial, easy to discuss topic… oh, wait. Nevermind. You’re trying to get me in trouble, aren’t you?

This subject is obviously controversial, with many people on either side holding beliefs so tightly it borders on religious fervor. Personally, I have never smoked marijuana and I do not plan to. From a Christian perspective, its intoxicating effects violate the instructions we are given concerning drunkenness, and from a personal perspective I just hate not having complete control of myself – this is why I never drink to excess either. I say this to show that I do not have a personal stake in this, and to be up-front about where my biases lie. These strong beliefs, along with the fact that society has such a bizarre and convoluted viewpoint on the subject, makes it difficult to establish any sort of real, balanced public forum or debate on the topic – as California is finding out right now the hard way. Let me then start by addressing some basic aspects of “how” and “why” legalization could or should occur before I get into whether or not it actually should happen. Continue reading Reader Question: Legalized Marijuana?

Google Wave: my initial thoughts

So I received my invite to Google Wave one week ago, and have been playing with it off and on since then.  It’s a fascinating platform, not quite what I expected, and it’s been really interesting to think about potential applications and uses of the platform.

My initial impression upon logging in was that it was a typical Google app, visually very clean, colorful, and smooth. I had some idea of how things worked from watching their tech demo video, so I began to play around with creating and joining waves. For those of you who haven’t geeked out to this as much as I have yet, “waves” are the individual threads (documents?) that the platform is built to create and share. The wave can be just yours, which would make it functionally similar to an office document, or you can collaborate on it by inviting other users to join the wave, or by making it public. Once a wave has multiple users, the users can edit the wave itself, either by changing the “base” wave or by adding comments, discussion threads, links, or other media. These individual additions each have their own privacy settings as well, so if I wanted to comment on a wave but only wanted the original author of the wave to see my comment, I could do that. The wave itself remembers each of these edits and the order in which they happened, and so all waves are able to be “replayed” so that the user can see how the document has evolved to the state it is in now. Continue reading Google Wave: my initial thoughts